Seeing what you want to see in OSS

Now that I’m done reading Geekonomics and have given it time to digest, I’ve got a couple of take-aways. One of them isn’t too much on topic with the rest of the book. In the chapter Doffing the Wizard Hats, the author suggests that:

As Steven Weber observed in The Success of Open Source, the Open Source movement has become a kind of Internet era Rorschach test.
People tend to see in the open source software movement the politics that they would like to see—a libertarian reverie, a perfect meritocracy, a utopian gift culture that celebrates an economics of abundance instead of scarcity, a virtual or electronic existence proof of communitarian ideals, a political movement aimed at replacing obsolete nineteenth-century capitalist structures with new “relations of production” more suited to the Information Age.

While I nodded vigorously the first time I read the quote it hasn’t survived my thought on the topic unscathed. I’ve been a big fan of Open Source and Free Software (the last time in this article I will capitalise the terms) since before I could lay hands on it, I don’t see it as a political expression. Open source has always been a practical issue to me.

From the time I booted Linux 0.95a on my 386/SX-20 I have been ever-thankful that free and open source software is available, and like many people (especially younger ones), I did try to turn it into a political expression. Hating Microsoft was as much about political posturing as it was a protest of the shoddy treatment I had received as a user of their software. I had been ticked off when they took away the ability to switch the option character (from ‘/’ to ‘-‘, which let us Unix-types use ‘/’ in pathnames), and I certainly wasn’t any more impressed when future DOS versions and Windows began to eat away at my (then-) copious free time, forcing me to spend more time kicking the OS and less time doing what I really wanted to do. As with any mistake in life, be it tight acid-wash jeans in the 1980s, strange musical tastes, or a penchant for too much beer, it’s something I look back on with a mixture of relief that I know better now and foolishness for having fallen into that habit.

Apparently not content to let Microsoft-bashing be the highlight of my political life, I also got somewhat into the free software vs. open source debate. The debate is far from over for a lot of people, but it’s not something I’ve paid attention to in a number of years. Other silly free software debates I was wise enough to be (mostly) quiet about were gcc vs. egcs, Perl vs. Python, Gnome vs. KDE, and quite a few more grassroots attempts to make mountains out of molehills.

Various other political scenes have come and gone in the past several years. “Forking is what open source is all about” vs. “forking is evil” battle, the “everyone should work on MyFaveProject and make it better” vs. “choice is good” feud, “$PROJECT is dead” chants, “if you don’t GPL $FOO I’ll call RMS on you” (as was the case with O’Caml when they decided on a new license), “ESR does not speak for me”, “Linus is $ADJECTIVE”, and the list goes on.

Where I first jumped in with both feet I quickly learned that I had to pick my battles. Before long I had realised that the best battle to pick was none at all, unless it was one that threatened me specifically. I also learned not to be too paranoid when assessing that threat.

The open source and free software community has been divided from the start. I think we got it from the Unix side of things. I remember being pretty young and my mom gave my brother a “Unix wars” poster for his bedroom wall. Now that which Unix you use is no longer politically interesting (you either use it or you don’t) the community has had to search for other divisions in itself to fight about.

I once lived in a housing co-op. The promise of such a thing is that everyone works together and makes the co-op a better place for all. Everyone joins committees that interest them and in doing so serves the community in the best way they can. Elders teach the younger folks the tried and true ways forward and… Well… It doesn’t quite work that way in real life, at least not in the co-op I lived in. Most people joined whatever committee they thought would be the least work. The elders and the younger folks may as well have formally declared war. Rather than work together, many people seemed to try to stab everyone else in the back so no one would try to take the title of “S/he who saved the co-op” from them. Dirty laundry was aired, rather than clean. People got so desperate for attention that they even started bringing their lawyer to co-op meetings. I’m not kidding. I left the co-op not long after.

In a lot of ways I think the nasty side of the FS/OSS community is the same as the co-op. While there are certainly political lessons I can tease out of the co-op aftermath I don’t feel a great need to do so. The same goes for the open source battles fought over the last several years. To be honest, if I’m talking about open source and someone starts up with those I either change the subject or leave.

So after all this rambling, finally my point — I don’t see any sort of political ideal in the FS/OSS community or in the act of releasing software under such a license. I strictly see a practical benefit, both for myself and others. No saluting Chairman Mao, no invoking Ché Guevara, no need to worship Linus, ESR, RMS, or any other set of initials. If you want to contribute, then go ahead. If not, then don’t. If you want to use the software, have at ‘er — and if not, then there’s a stack of commercial alternatives you can look at. The more that opinion and dogma are allowed to play a role in open source the more time is wasted.

These days the “in thing” is to dream up ways that open source is under attack. From websites that don’t support Firefox to perceived threats from Microsoft (who actually has a near-OSD-compliant license now) or Sun (who just bought MySQL and hired two big-time Pythonistas) or SCO (whose antics have not yet made any measurable impact on open source), everyone wants to rally the troops and storm the castle. If you doubt this, simply follow Slashdot or Digg for a little while. Once the troops are rallied, everyone writes an e-mail or floods a webserver or does whatever they’re told to do, and at the end of the day they claim victory, no matter the outcome.

With antics like these it is hard to take any sort of Rorschach test too seriously. A Rorschach has always looked a bit like goat barf to me, anyway.

What do I want to see in the FS/OSS community? Less opinion, less dogma, a lot more live-and-let-live. Tolerate others, even the ones who really seriously piss you off. Try to find the right times to watch something and the right times to turn your back. Keep a sense of humour — nothing pisses off someone who’s trying to get under your skin like being laughed at.

That’s as close to a call to action that you’ll get from me. I’ll just be over here, doing my thing.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s